Every #1 Baby Name Since 1910: The Complete List
In 116 years of American records, the top of the chart has been a closed shop. Only 19 names have ever been #1 — eleven girls' names and eight boys' names — and two of them held the crown for nearly half the century between them.
Mary: 46 years at #1. She ruled 1910–1946 straight, was interrupted, and took the crown back for nine more years (1953–1961), the last of them in 1961. Michael: 44 years — a six-year run in the 1950s, then one year off, then a 38-year reign (1961–1998) so long that two generations of parents experienced him not as a fashion but as a fact of nature.
The strange episodes inside the table
The coup and the restoration (1947–1961). In 1947 Linda did what no name had managed in 37 years: she took the crown from a reigning Mary. It lasted six years — and then Mary did something almost no dethroned #1 ever does. She came back, for nine more years (1953–1961). The early 1950s were the restoration era on both charts: in 1953, the very year Mary returned, Robert also retook the boys' crown — for a single year wedged between James's 13-year reign and Michael's arrival.
The one-year king (1960). David's 1960 reign is the only single-year #1 in the entire table — and it sits inside Michael's interrupted reign, splitting it into the 1950s run and the 38-year run. One year of David is the punctuation mark in forty-four years of Michael — and it makes Michael a returning champion too: he lost the crown in 1960 and took it straight back for 38 years.
The split reign (1991–1995). Jessica ruled 1985–1990, lost two years to Ashley, then took the crown back for 1993–1995 — the same trick Emma later pulled (champion in 2008, gone for five years, champion again 2014–2018). Returns happen, but they are rare and usually brief: on the boys' side the only ones are Robert's single year (1953) and Michael's resumption (1961). Every other dethroned #1 in the table stayed dethroned.
The reign everyone forgets (2009–2010). Isabella's two years at #1 are the most commonly omitted entry in this table — sandwiched between Emma's two reigns and Sophia's three years, she tends to drop out of retellings. She's in the table below, where she belongs.
The 90-baby photo-finish (2013). Jacob's 14-year reign didn't end in a rout. In 2013 Noah beat him 18,291 babies to 18,201 — a margin of 90 newborns, half of one percent, to start a four-year reign of his own. The next changing of the guard, Liam in 2017, has now lasted nine years and counting.
Total years at #1
| Girls | Years | Boys | Years | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary | 46 | Michael | 44 | |
| Jennifer | 15 | Robert | 17 | |
| Emily | 12 | John | 14 | |
| Jessica | 9 | Jacob | 14 | |
| Lisa | 8 | James | 13 | |
| Olivia | 7 (2019– ) | Liam | 9 (2017– ) | |
| Linda | 6 | Noah | 4 | |
| Emma | 6 | David | 1 | |
| Sophia | 3 | |||
| Ashley | 2 | |||
| Isabella | 2 |
Two reigns are still running: Olivia (2019–2025) and Liam (2017–2025). Every previous reign in the table has an end date; theirs don't — yet.
The complete list, 1910–2025
| Year | Girls' #1 | Babies | Boys' #1 | Babies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910 | Mary | 22,847 | John | 11,451 |
| 1911 | Mary | 24,388 | John | 13,446 |
| 1912 | Mary | 32,298 | John | 24,586 |
| 1913 | Mary | 36,640 | John | 29,324 |
| 1914 | Mary | 45,345 | John | 37,945 |
| 1915 | Mary | 58,187 | John | 47,579 |
| 1916 | Mary | 61,433 | John | 50,046 |
| 1917 | Mary | 64,280 | John | 51,854 |
| 1918 | Mary | 67,372 | John | 56,559 |
| 1919 | Mary | 65,837 | John | 53,530 |
| 1920 | Mary | 70,978 | John | 56,918 |
| 1921 | Mary | 73,983 | John | 58,230 |
| 1922 | Mary | 72,167 | John | 57,268 |
| 1923 | Mary | 71,630 | John | 57,469 |
| 1924 | Mary | 73,513 | Robert | 60,795 |
| 1925 | Mary | 70,603 | Robert | 60,903 |
| 1926 | Mary | 67,830 | Robert | 61,113 |
| 1927 | Mary | 70,617 | Robert | 61,657 |
| 1928 | Mary | 66,861 | Robert | 60,665 |
| 1929 | Mary | 63,500 | Robert | 59,799 |
| 1930 | Mary | 64,129 | Robert | 62,120 |
| 1931 | Mary | 60,294 | Robert | 60,495 |
| 1932 | Mary | 59,865 | Robert | 59,240 |
| 1933 | Mary | 55,484 | Robert | 54,188 |
| 1934 | Mary | 56,906 | Robert | 55,823 |
| 1935 | Mary | 55,068 | Robert | 56,509 |
| 1936 | Mary | 54,361 | Robert | 58,477 |
| 1937 | Mary | 55,639 | Robert | 61,807 |
| 1938 | Mary | 56,202 | Robert | 62,261 |
| 1939 | Mary | 54,902 | Robert | 59,631 |
| 1940 | Mary | 56,201 | James | 62,452 |
| 1941 | Mary | 58,023 | James | 66,714 |
| 1942 | Mary | 63,242 | James | 77,164 |
| 1943 | Mary | 66,166 | James | 80,236 |
| 1944 | Mary | 62,468 | James | 76,936 |
| 1945 | Mary | 59,284 | James | 74,439 |
| 1946 | Mary | 67,459 | James | 87,432 |
| 1947 | Linda | 99,685 | James | 94,743 |
| 1948 | Linda | 96,178 | James | 88,544 |
| 1949 | Linda | 90,986 | James | 86,776 |
| 1950 | Linda | 80,437 | James | 86,227 |
| 1951 | Linda | 73,884 | James | 87,099 |
| 1952 | Linda | 67,076 | James | 87,035 |
| 1953 | Mary | 64,330 | Robert | 86,092 |
| 1954 | Mary | 67,994 | Michael | 88,481 |
| 1955 | Mary | 63,164 | Michael | 88,279 |
| 1956 | Mary | 61,750 | Michael | 90,611 |
| 1957 | Mary | 61,092 | Michael | 92,705 |
| 1958 | Mary | 55,840 | Michael | 90,494 |
| 1959 | Mary | 54,473 | Michael | 85,285 |
| 1960 | Mary | 51,474 | David | 85,928 |
| 1961 | Mary | 47,657 | Michael | 86,908 |
| 1962 | Lisa | 46,085 | Michael | 85,038 |
| 1963 | Lisa | 56,036 | Michael | 83,794 |
| 1964 | Lisa | 54,272 | Michael | 82,666 |
| 1965 | Lisa | 60,262 | Michael | 81,058 |
| 1966 | Lisa | 56,912 | Michael | 80,008 |
| 1967 | Lisa | 52,429 | Michael | 82,455 |
| 1968 | Lisa | 49,528 | Michael | 82,027 |
| 1969 | Lisa | 45,034 | Michael | 85,226 |
| 1970 | Jennifer | 46,159 | Michael | 85,312 |
| 1971 | Jennifer | 56,785 | Michael | 77,601 |
| 1972 | Jennifer | 63,605 | Michael | 71,420 |
| 1973 | Jennifer | 62,454 | Michael | 67,851 |
| 1974 | Jennifer | 63,106 | Michael | 67,579 |
| 1975 | Jennifer | 58,180 | Michael | 68,453 |
| 1976 | Jennifer | 59,476 | Michael | 66,971 |
| 1977 | Jennifer | 58,961 | Michael | 67,608 |
| 1978 | Jennifer | 56,310 | Michael | 67,139 |
| 1979 | Jennifer | 56,713 | Michael | 67,717 |
| 1980 | Jennifer | 58,383 | Michael | 68,656 |
| 1981 | Jennifer | 57,035 | Michael | 68,733 |
| 1982 | Jennifer | 57,102 | Michael | 68,176 |
| 1983 | Jennifer | 54,335 | Michael | 67,976 |
| 1984 | Jennifer | 50,551 | Michael | 67,703 |
| 1985 | Jessica | 48,343 | Michael | 64,876 |
| 1986 | Jessica | 52,657 | Michael | 64,170 |
| 1987 | Jessica | 55,984 | Michael | 63,625 |
| 1988 | Jessica | 51,523 | Michael | 64,095 |
| 1989 | Jessica | 47,890 | Michael | 65,386 |
| 1990 | Jessica | 46,461 | Michael | 65,270 |
| 1991 | Ashley | 43,489 | Michael | 60,782 |
| 1992 | Ashley | 38,451 | Michael | 54,373 |
| 1993 | Jessica | 34,979 | Michael | 49,552 |
| 1994 | Jessica | 32,113 | Michael | 44,463 |
| 1995 | Jessica | 27,938 | Michael | 41,403 |
| 1996 | Emily | 25,148 | Michael | 38,360 |
| 1997 | Emily | 25,729 | Michael | 37,543 |
| 1998 | Emily | 26,177 | Michael | 36,608 |
| 1999 | Emily | 26,535 | Jacob | 35,342 |
| 2000 | Emily | 25,953 | Jacob | 34,460 |
| 2001 | Emily | 25,050 | Jacob | 32,520 |
| 2002 | Emily | 24,454 | Jacob | 30,552 |
| 2003 | Emily | 25,682 | Jacob | 29,605 |
| 2004 | Emily | 25,021 | Jacob | 27,868 |
| 2005 | Emily | 23,921 | Jacob | 25,809 |
| 2006 | Emily | 21,381 | Jacob | 24,811 |
| 2007 | Emily | 19,331 | Jacob | 24,238 |
| 2008 | Emma | 18,787 | Jacob | 22,547 |
| 2009 | Isabella | 22,257 | Jacob | 21,113 |
| 2010 | Isabella | 22,856 | Jacob | 22,052 |
| 2011 | Sophia | 21,780 | Jacob | 20,269 |
| 2012 | Sophia | 22,158 | Jacob | 18,899 |
| 2013 | Sophia | 21,255 | Noah | 18,291 |
| 2014 | Emma | 20,970 | Noah | 19,344 |
| 2015 | Emma | 20,487 | Noah | 19,680 |
| 2016 | Emma | 19,550 | Noah | 19,188 |
| 2017 | Emma | 19,873 | Liam | 18,874 |
| 2018 | Emma | 18,824 | Liam | 19,977 |
| 2019 | Olivia | 18,577 | Liam | 20,631 |
| 2020 | Olivia | 17,691 | Liam | 19,865 |
| 2021 | Olivia | 17,847 | Liam | 20,424 |
| 2022 | Olivia | 16,670 | Liam | 20,579 |
| 2023 | Olivia | 15,329 | Liam | 20,904 |
| 2024 | Olivia | 14,772 | Liam | 22,252 |
| 2025 | Olivia | 13,544 | Liam | 20,818 |
| Reading it as one column tells the century's story better than any essay: the long Mary and Michael monarchies, the Jennifer dam-break of 1970, the sudden churn after 1999 — and the fact that since 2013 the boys' crown has changed hands on margins a single maternity ward could swing. |
Our advice: when someone tells you a name "is the new #1," check which dynasty you're in. Coronations used to last decades; the modern crown passes every four to nine years. A #1 name today is a renter, not an owner — which makes it a far safer choice than Mary ever was.
The eras behind the table: baby names by decade, and the two longest residents, Mary and Michael.
See name recommendations based on your last name
Source: U.S. Social Security Administration · Data through 2025 · Updated 2026
Recommended articles
New data stories
- Mary: The Rise and Fall of America's Biggest Baby Name
- The Fastest-Rising Baby Names in America
- The #1 Baby Name Isn't What It Used to Be
- Sophia Is Secretly the #1 Baby Name in America
- The Names That Rule Exactly One State
- The Most Loved Baby Names in America, According to 161,918 Votes
- Popular Isn't the Same as Loved
- The Names Everyone Has an Opinion About
- The Biggest Fallers: Baby Names Cooling Off Fast Since 2020
- One-Year Rockets: The Biggest Baby Name Jumps of 2025 Alone
- Brand New in the Top 1000: The Class of 2025
- Michael: The King Who Ruled for 44 Years
- Olivia vs Emma: The Duel at the Top of the Chart
- Liam vs Noah: Twelve Years, Two Names, One Crown
- Jennifer: From 63,605 Babies a Year to 464
- Linda: The Biggest Girls' Name Ever — and Where She Went
- The Vintage Revival Is Real: Violet, Hazel and the Comeback Girls
- Theodore: The Boys' Comeback King
- Names That Vanished: Myrtle, Gertrude and Ethel
- Mildred Was #6. Read That Again.
- The Next Vintage Wave: 1920s Stars Still Sleeping
- Charlotte's America: Who Really Won Your State in 2025?
- Hawaii Does Its Own Thing
- Noah Owns New Mexico (and the State Gap Is Closing)
- Dakota: The Most Gender-Balanced Name in America
- Avery: How a Boys' Name Became a Girls' Name
- Leslie: The Crossover That Completed
- Charlie: The 53/47 Name
- Emerson and the Surname Crossover Wave
- Arya and Khaleesi: The Game of Thrones Curve
- Elsa: The Frozen Spike That Melted
- Bella: What Twilight Did to a Name
- Kylo: The Star Wars Name That Refuses to Die
- Karen: What the Data Actually Says
- The -Aiden Empire: One Sound, Eight Spellings, 18,000 Babies
- Jackson vs Jaxon vs Jaxson: The Spelling War of the Decade
- Zoe vs Zoey: The Y That Ate the Chart
- One Name, Four Spellings: Muhammad, Mohamed, Mohammad and Mohammed
- How to Spot a Celebrity Name Spike (Before You Copy One)
- Girls Get More Names Than Boys — and They Always Have
- The Baby Boom, in One Table
- Twenty Babies Can Win a State
- Before You Choose a Name, Check Your State Chart (2025 Edition)
- John: The Name That Never Left the Top 28
- Elizabeth: The Name That Cannot Fall
- Names That Fell Out of the Top 1000 in 2025
- Every #1 Baby Name Since 1910: The Complete List
- The Most Lopsided Name in Every State
- California vs Texas: Two Giant States, Two Different Tastes
- Are Baby Names Getting Longer?
- A Is for Amelia: How the Vowel Letters Took Over the Top 50
- One-Hit Wonders: Names That Spiked for a Single Year
- Peak-Proof: The Steadiest Names of the Century
- The Names Voters Loved Before America Did
- Perfect Scores: Why 10,157 Names Average Five Stars
- Girls' Names Collect the Opinions





