Are Baby Names Getting Longer?
Short answer: they were. Then they stopped — in 1989 — and they've been quietly getting shorter ever since.
We measured it the only honest way: every baby born in America in a given year, weighted by how many babies actually received each name, and averaged the letters. (A name given to 90,000 babies moves the average; a name given to five doesn't.) Here is the shape of a century.
| Decade | Girls' average length | Boys' average length |
|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 5.76 letters | 5.71 letters |
| 1950s | 5.83 | 5.68 |
| 1970s | 6.10 | 5.85 |
| 1980s | 6.32 | 5.98 |
| 1990s | 6.36 | 5.97 |
| 2010s | 6.00 | 5.77 |
| 2020s | 5.87 | 5.67 |
The shortest names in history were the Baby Boomers'
The counterintuitive dip comes first. The shortest-named generation in our data isn't the distant past — it's the late 1950s. Girls' names bottomed out in 1959 at 5.73 letters; boys' names bottomed the same year at 5.60. That was the two-syllable snap era: Linda, Karen, Debra, Susan, Nancy for girls; James, Robert, Michael — and a wall of five- and six-letter standards — for boys. Mid-century America named fast.
Before that, names were middling: 1910's girls averaged 5.67 letters (the shortest single year for girls in the whole series — the Mary-and-Anna era), rising gently through the 1920s and 30s.
Then came the stretch: 1960 to 1989
From the 1959 floor, the average climbed for thirty straight years. Girls gained three-quarters of a letter, peaking in 1989 at 6.42 letters. Boys peaked the same year at 6.01. Those were the Jennifer-and-Jessica, Christopher-and-Alexander years: longer names, more syllables, more letters on the birth certificate.
The long-name share tells the same story. In the 1950s, just 13.1% of baby girls received a name of eight or more letters. By the 1980s it was 20.6% — one girl in five. Boys went from 3.3% to a peak of 11.3% in the 1990s.
And then, quietly, the shrink
No announcement was made, but the turn is unmistakable. Girls' average length has fallen from 6.42 (1989) to 5.87 in 2025 — back between the 1940s and 1950s level. Boys are at 5.66, statistically indistinguishable from their 1950s selves (5.68). The eight-plus-letter share for girls is back down to 13.2% in the 2020s — the 1950s figure, almost to the decimal.
Today's chart explains why. The top of the 2025 list runs short: Mia, Liam, Noah, Emma, Luna, Ezra. The modern taste isn't for longer names; it's for compact ones with open vowels. The long-name era turns out to have been an episode — roughly 1970 to 2000 — not a direction.
Our advice: if you're weighing a long name against a short one, know which way the wind is blowing. A Maximilian or an Evangeline born in 2026 will be the long name in a class of Mias and Leos — distinctive by length alone. A four-letter name, meanwhile, is the most crowded real estate in modern naming: short is where the competition is.
For the decade-by-decade charts behind this, see baby names by decade and the current most popular girl baby names 2025.
See name recommendations based on your last name
Source: U.S. Social Security Administration · Data through 2025 · Updated 2026
Recommended articles
New data stories
- Mary: The Rise and Fall of America's Biggest Baby Name
- The Fastest-Rising Baby Names in America
- The #1 Baby Name Isn't What It Used to Be
- Sophia Is Secretly the #1 Baby Name in America
- The Names That Rule Exactly One State
- The Most Loved Baby Names in America, According to 161,918 Votes
- Popular Isn't the Same as Loved
- The Names Everyone Has an Opinion About
- The Biggest Fallers: Baby Names Cooling Off Fast Since 2020
- One-Year Rockets: The Biggest Baby Name Jumps of 2025 Alone
- Brand New in the Top 1000: The Class of 2025
- Michael: The King Who Ruled for 44 Years
- Olivia vs Emma: The Duel at the Top of the Chart
- Liam vs Noah: Twelve Years, Two Names, One Crown
- Jennifer: From 63,605 Babies a Year to 464
- Linda: The Biggest Girls' Name Ever — and Where She Went
- The Vintage Revival Is Real: Violet, Hazel and the Comeback Girls
- Theodore: The Boys' Comeback King
- Names That Vanished: Myrtle, Gertrude and Ethel
- Mildred Was #6. Read That Again.
- The Next Vintage Wave: 1920s Stars Still Sleeping
- Charlotte's America: Who Really Won Your State in 2025?
- Hawaii Does Its Own Thing
- Noah Owns New Mexico (and the State Gap Is Closing)
- Dakota: The Most Gender-Balanced Name in America
- Avery: How a Boys' Name Became a Girls' Name
- Leslie: The Crossover That Completed
- Charlie: The 53/47 Name
- Emerson and the Surname Crossover Wave
- Arya and Khaleesi: The Game of Thrones Curve
- Elsa: The Frozen Spike That Melted
- Bella: What Twilight Did to a Name
- Kylo: The Star Wars Name That Refuses to Die
- Karen: What the Data Actually Says
- The -Aiden Empire: One Sound, Eight Spellings, 18,000 Babies
- Jackson vs Jaxon vs Jaxson: The Spelling War of the Decade
- Zoe vs Zoey: The Y That Ate the Chart
- One Name, Four Spellings: Muhammad, Mohamed, Mohammad and Mohammed
- How to Spot a Celebrity Name Spike (Before You Copy One)
- Girls Get More Names Than Boys — and They Always Have
- The Baby Boom, in One Table
- Twenty Babies Can Win a State
- Before You Choose a Name, Check Your State Chart (2025 Edition)
- John: The Name That Never Left the Top 28
- Elizabeth: The Name That Cannot Fall
- Names That Fell Out of the Top 1000 in 2025
- Every #1 Baby Name Since 1910: The Complete List
- The Most Lopsided Name in Every State
- California vs Texas: Two Giant States, Two Different Tastes
- Are Baby Names Getting Longer?
- A Is for Amelia: How the Vowel Letters Took Over the Top 50
- One-Hit Wonders: Names That Spiked for a Single Year
- Peak-Proof: The Steadiest Names of the Century
- The Names Voters Loved Before America Did
- Perfect Scores: Why 10,157 Names Average Five Stars
- Girls' Names Collect the Opinions





