Emerson and the Surname Crossover Wave
The old crossover story had a direction. A boys' name would tip toward girls, the boys would abandon it, and within a generation it belonged to one sex entirely. Leslie did it. Avery did it.
The surname names of the 2020s are doing something different: they are growing for both sexes at the same time.
Emerson: bigger on both sides
In 2010, Emerson was given to 994 girls and 609 boys. In 2025: 2,226 girls and 1,362 boys — ranked #122 for girls and #253 for boys.
Both sides more than doubled in fifteen years, and the split barely moved: girls were 62% of Emersons in 2010 and are 62% today. This is not a name being taken over. It is a name expanding in both directions at once, with girls simply expanding from a head start.
Parker: the near-even surname
Parker shows the same shape from the other side. Boys still lead — 3,469 boys to 2,525 girls in 2025 — but the girls have quadrupled since 2010 (616 babies), while the boys have come down from their 2015 peak of 5,418.
The result is a name ranked almost identically for both sexes: #102 for boys, #106 for girls. A Parker born in 2025 is 42% likely to be a girl — up from 12% in 2010 (616 of 5,340).
Finley: the wave can recede
Finley is the cautionary case. The girls' Finley surged first — 763 babies in 2010 to a peak of 1,591 in 2015 — then halved: 720 girls in 2025, below where she started. The boys' Finley, meanwhile, grew steadily and held: 386 in 2010, 992 in 2025.
So in 2025 Finley sits at 42% girls, the same split as Parker — but it arrived there by the girls retreating, not advancing. A surname's girls' wave, it turns out, can crest and fall back while the boys' side keeps the name afloat.
Rowan: the counterexample
Not every surname name crosses. Rowan grew on both sides too — 576 girls and 928 boys in 2010 became 1,222 girls and 5,212 boys in 2025 — but the boys grew five-fold and now take 81% of the name (ranked #58 for boys, #248 for girls).
Rowan and Emerson started 2010 in nearly the same place. Fifteen years later one is a girls-led name growing for everyone, and the other is a boys' name with a girls' minority. The surname itself doesn't decide the direction; the culture around each name does.
Why surnames behave differently
The old flips were driven by sound: a boys' name that started to sound soft or pretty tipped, and there was no way back. Surnames arrive with a different kind of baggage — they read as family names, place names, occupation names. They carry no strongly gendered sound to tip, so both sexes can adopt them in parallel, and the split can sit at 60/40 or 40/60 for years without collapsing.
Our advice: A surname name's split is a snapshot, not a destination. Emerson's 62/38 has been stable for fifteen years, which is genuinely reassuring if you want a name that stays shared. But check both trend lines on the name's pages before you commit: Finley's girls looked unstoppable in 2015, and Rowan's girls are a shrinking minority of a booming boys' name. The two curves, not the current split, tell you where a crossover name is actually going.
Watch the wave on both charts: Emerson (girl), Emerson (boy) and Parker (boy).
See name recommendations based on your last name
Source: U.S. Social Security Administration · Data through 2025 · Updated 2026
Recommended articles
New data stories
- Mary: The Rise and Fall of America's Biggest Baby Name
- The Fastest-Rising Baby Names in America
- The #1 Baby Name Isn't What It Used to Be
- Sophia Is Secretly the #1 Baby Name in America
- The Names That Rule Exactly One State
- The Most Loved Baby Names in America, According to 161,918 Votes
- Popular Isn't the Same as Loved
- The Names Everyone Has an Opinion About
- The Biggest Fallers: Baby Names Cooling Off Fast Since 2020
- One-Year Rockets: The Biggest Baby Name Jumps of 2025 Alone
- Brand New in the Top 1000: The Class of 2025
- Michael: The King Who Ruled for 44 Years
- Olivia vs Emma: The Duel at the Top of the Chart
- Liam vs Noah: Twelve Years, Two Names, One Crown
- Jennifer: From 63,605 Babies a Year to 464
- Linda: The Biggest Girls' Name Ever — and Where She Went
- The Vintage Revival Is Real: Violet, Hazel and the Comeback Girls
- Theodore: The Boys' Comeback King
- Names That Vanished: Myrtle, Gertrude and Ethel
- Mildred Was #6. Read That Again.
- The Next Vintage Wave: 1920s Stars Still Sleeping
- Charlotte's America: Who Really Won Your State in 2025?
- Hawaii Does Its Own Thing
- Noah Owns New Mexico (and the State Gap Is Closing)
- Dakota: The Most Gender-Balanced Name in America
- Avery: How a Boys' Name Became a Girls' Name
- Leslie: The Crossover That Completed
- Charlie: The 53/47 Name
- Emerson and the Surname Crossover Wave
- Arya and Khaleesi: The Game of Thrones Curve
- Elsa: The Frozen Spike That Melted
- Bella: What Twilight Did to a Name
- Kylo: The Star Wars Name That Refuses to Die
- Karen: What the Data Actually Says
- The -Aiden Empire: One Sound, Eight Spellings, 18,000 Babies
- Jackson vs Jaxon vs Jaxson: The Spelling War of the Decade
- Zoe vs Zoey: The Y That Ate the Chart
- One Name, Four Spellings: Muhammad, Mohamed, Mohammad and Mohammed
- How to Spot a Celebrity Name Spike (Before You Copy One)
- Girls Get More Names Than Boys — and They Always Have
- The Baby Boom, in One Table
- Twenty Babies Can Win a State
- Before You Choose a Name, Check Your State Chart (2025 Edition)
- John: The Name That Never Left the Top 28
- Elizabeth: The Name That Cannot Fall
- Names That Fell Out of the Top 1000 in 2025
- Every #1 Baby Name Since 1910: The Complete List
- The Most Lopsided Name in Every State
- California vs Texas: Two Giant States, Two Different Tastes
- Are Baby Names Getting Longer?
- A Is for Amelia: How the Vowel Letters Took Over the Top 50
- One-Hit Wonders: Names That Spiked for a Single Year
- Peak-Proof: The Steadiest Names of the Century
- The Names Voters Loved Before America Did
- Perfect Scores: Why 10,157 Names Average Five Stars
- Girls' Names Collect the Opinions





